Chinese judge slams Trump as a 'public enemy of the rule of law'
Image Caption:Mr Trump has vowed to win the appeal and get travel restrictions back in force
By Sunita Patel-Carstairs and Connor Sephton, News Reporters
A top Chinese judge has branded Donald Trump an "enemy of the rule of law" for his disparaging remarks about a US federal judge who suspended his travel ban.
In a personal attack on James Robart on Saturday, the US President described him as a "so-called judge" in a series of ill-tempered tweets.
He also accused the Seattle judge of opening "up our country to potential terrorists" with his "ridiculous" decision to halt the order that temporarily blocked all refugees and citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US.
Image Caption:Donald Trump launched an unusual attack on the judge behind the ruling
In a blog post, dated Sunday, Judge He Fan who serves at the Supreme People's Court of China, blasted Mr Trump for "insulting" Mr Robart.
He wrote that under the American system's separation of powers, a president who is dealt a judicial defeat should bear the loss silently, rather than lash out at the judge in question.
He said Mr Trump had set a poor example and lost respect for having "led the way in insulting a judge, with the Vice President and his political party swarming to his defence (and) in a country known as the most democratic and most respectful of the rule of law".
"The president who would curse a judge and the thug who would kill a judge are both public enemies of the rule of law," he wrote, referencing the recent murder of a retired judge in southern China. "Who cares that you control the armed forces and have nuclear weapons at your disposal. Your dignity has been swept away and you are no different than a scoundrel," he added.
The US Department of Justice is challenging Mr Robart's ruling and wants the immigration restrictions reinstated.
The President's decree, signed on 27 January, barred entry for 120 days for any refugees awaiting resettlement.
Citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen were also banned for 90 days.
A US federal appeals court will later announce whether it has decided to uphold Mr Robart's judgment - or reinstate the immigration restrictions. Government lawyers insist Mr Trump's executive order is a "lawful exercise" and that the President has clear authority to "suspend the entry of any class of aliens" in the name of national security.
They have also criticised Washington and Minnesota, the two states which launched the legal challenge against the executive order, for asking courts to "take the extraordinary step of second-guessing a formal national security judgment made by the President himself".
Three judges, randomly selected at the California-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, have been hearing the case.
If either side is unhappy with the outcome, a showdown in the Supreme Court may follow.
Lawyers representing Washington and Minnesota have warned that resuming the travel ban would "unleash chaos again" - separating families and leaving university students stranded. Their case has been buoyed by 10 former US officials - including secretaries of state and CIA directors who served under Republican and Democratic presidents - who filed a declaration in the case arguing that the travel ban served no national security purposes.
A coalition led by some of the world's biggest tech firms is also taking on the ban, with Elon Musk's Tesla and SpaceX the latest to add their names to a list of 30 companies including Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Twitter.
It comes as the President has accused the media of deliberately minimising coverage of the threat posed by Islamic State.
A list of 78 terror attacks has been released by the White House, with the administration claiming "most" of them did not get sufficient media attention.
The Paris attacks of November 2015 and the San Bernardino shootings of December 2015, both of which received widespread attention and in-depth reporting, are among the events on the list.
A man has died and two other people were hurt after a man drove into a pedestrian area in Heidelberg, Germany. Image copyright AP Image caption The motives for the attack are unclear, police say The attacker, who was believed to have been armed with a knife, was shot and injured by police in a brief standoff after fleeing the scene on foot. His motives are unclear, but there are no indications this was a terrorist attack, police say. In December an Islamist attacker drove a lorry into a Berlin Christmas market, killing 12 people and injuring 49. In Heidelberg the attacker, described as a 35-year-old German, drove what is thought to be a rental car into pedestrians in one of the city's central squares, injuring three people. One of them, a 73-year-old German man, later died in hospital. The attacker then left the car but was tracked down, shot and seriously injured by police near an old swimming pool. Police were unable to confirm local media reports that the attacke...
6 hours ago From the section Europe Share Image copyright HAZTE OIR Image caption Catholic group Hazte Oir claims its bus is just stating biological facts A judge has backed Madrid's decision to force a bright orange bus emblazoned with an anti-transgender message off its roads. Jose Juan Escalonilla said the bus could not move until the slogans, including "if you are born a man, you are a man", were removed. The bus belongs to Catholic group, Hazte Oir, which had planned to take it on a nationwide tour of Spanish cities. The public prosecutor is investigating whether it is a possible hate crime. Other messages on the side of the bus state "boys have penises, girls have vulvas. Do not be fooled" and "if you are a woman, you will continue to be one". Mr Escalonilla did not find the bus went as far as being a hate crime. However, he said he believed the bus was an "act of contempt" meant to "injure...
China piles pressure on North Korea by banning coal imports 18 February 2017 From the section China Share Image copyright GETTY IMAGES China is suspending all imports of coal from North Korea as part of efforts to increase pressure on the country over its latest missile test. China's commerce ministry said the ban would operate until the end of 2017. It follows reports last week that China had rejected a shipment of North Korean coal worth $1m (£806,000; €942,100). The ban brings China, North Korea's only ally, closer to fully implementing tough sanctions aimed at stopping Pyongyang's nuclear weapons programme. Coal is North Korea's biggest export, with its shipments to China a mainstay of the country's fragile economy. The latest development comes just days after the suspicious killing of the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's half brother, Kim Jong-nam, at an airport in Malaysia. Kim, who was largely estranged from his...
Comments
Post a Comment